Closed rayankans closed 5 years ago
Please alphabetize. It seems odd to shadow PaymentAddress
as ContactAddress
but I guess it can work for future-proofing in case other fields would have to be added.
Is there sufficient (stated) implementation interest for this addition?
The use case interest would definitely be ordering someone a gift.
/me has shipped chocolates I just ordered to you.
Thanks Peter, I alphabetized the enum entries.
I extended PaymentAddress
because ideally that's what we should be using, and this unblocks the spec until it's refactored into its own definition. If we ever decide to use our own thing at some point, it makes sense to name it ContactAddress
from now, since it's an interface and will be web-exposed.
I've delayed resolving your concerns until after some TPAC discussions, and can confirm that there is enough interest to move forward with this.
Related to issue #12