Closed msporny closed 1 month ago
The issue was discussed in a meeting on 2024-10-16
@iherman wrote:
All the use case seem to be (mostly) around identifiers, making it more explicit by the reference to the DID use cases. It does not really justify the usage in VCs. I believe such use case would be important with, if possible, a reference to the VC use cases as well
Done in 6ad135b7aac59637b0818de7db5108e0a12028b7.
We have a bunch of terms defined for referencing crypto keys, must notably Multikeys and JSONWebKeys. Something in the use cases should justify the creation of those here.
Done in 8dac97593e78a8efd5ac910e3c5189276d20b710.
Editorial, multiple reviews, changes requested and made, no objections, merging.
This PR is an attempt to partially address issue #93 and #94 by adding a Use Cases and Requirements section.
/cc @jyasskin and @hadleybeeman
Preview | Diff