Open bramus opened 3 months ago
No concerns – happy to publish a new WD.
@astearns @atanassov - I think the changes here are all based on resolutions already, but we could get one here if needed. Maybe at the top of tomorrow's meeting, or async?
If all of the normative changes are backed by resolutions you can use https://wiki.csswg.org/spec/publish as the resolution link to publish a regular working draft (see step 2)
@bramus I see that an updated WD has not been published. Editors @fantasai @mirisuzanne @tabatkins Do you need any help?
I think I was wrong about all changes having resolutions. I'm not sure where the first bullet point was discussed or resolved. #8380 has a comment along the same lines, but is related to a deferred feature (a scope combinator rather than nesting). I'll see if I can track down a resolution.
Is that part of the change perhaps related to https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/7233? I’m guessing the clarification was meant to be followed by defining the ~~ combinator, but that got deferred.
Yeah, I think it came out of discussions around 8380 (>>) and 7233 (~~) which got deferred. Because they made that particularly unclear. But I don't see resolution around it. 🤷🏻♀️ I don't think it's controversial. Happy to go ahead and publish. Just something I noticed.
The CSS Working Group just discussed [css-cascade-6] Publish an updated WD
, and agreed to the following:
RESOLVED: we publish current draft, and we open an issue for the multiple nested scopes
Looking at the current WD of css-cascade-6 it still includes both the strong and weak scoping steps in the cascade. Since then, with the WG we settled on using only weak scoping, among a few other changes & additions, as listed in the changes:
I think it would be good to publish an updated WD as authors that read the WD will be confused: the thing that’s shipping in Safari and Chrome (and Firefox in the future) implements the cascade as currently described only in the ED, not the WD.
Any concerns with this, @mirisuzanne?