section > div repeat(> ul > li) { /* ... */ }
which is equal to writing
section > div > ul > li,
section > div > ul > li > ul > li,
section > div > ul > li > ul > li > ul > li,
section > div > ul > li > ul > li > ul > li > ul > li,
section > div > ul > li > ul > li > ul > li > ul > li > ul > li,
... {}
The specificity would be the same of the matched "splatted" selector. Having this would solve a lot of problems derived from too generic css selectors' specificity that designers often encounter.
Would this make sense to have in your opinion?
Thank you for reading this. This is my third request in very short time, I promise I will shut up now :-P
Hello,
The specificity would be the same of the matched "splatted" selector. Having this would solve a lot of problems derived from too generic css selectors' specificity that designers often encounter.
Would this make sense to have in your opinion?
Thank you for reading this. This is my third request in very short time, I promise I will shut up now :-P