Wide Review of CSS Fonts 4

w3c / csswg-drafts

CSS Working Group Editor Drafts

https://drafts.csswg.org/

Other

4.5k stars 666 forks source link

Wide Review of CSS Fonts 4 #4944

Open svgeesus opened 4 years ago

svgeesus commented 4 years ago

Wide review status for CSS Fonts 4

Horizontal review

[x] A11y review [Tracked]
[ ] I18n review [Tracked]
[ ] PING review [Tracked]
[x] Security review [Tracked]
[x] TAG: src descriptor | Variable fonts additions | font-palette and font-palette-values

Technical review

[ ] UTC?
[ ] SC29?

svgeesus commented 4 years ago

Privacy issues

[css-fonts] JS-free probing of Unicode support of fonts

svgeesus commented 4 years ago

Security review requested 6 Oct 2020

fantasai commented 4 years ago

Wide review includes people outside of W3C, and having the latest CSS Fonts 4 publication one year out of date isn't really conducive to that. Can we get the draft updated?

svgeesus commented 4 years ago

No problem, especially since the current PING vs. I18n impasse plus the uncertainty about new generic font families means we won't be going to CR anytime soon.

fantasai commented 4 years ago

@svgeesus We can publish whenever we want... so we should publish as often as needed to keep /TR consistent with CSSWG consensus!

css-meeting-bot commented 4 years ago

The CSS Working Group just discussed Wide Review of CSS Fonts 4, and agreed to the following:

RESOLVED: republish a new WD

The full IRC log of that discussion

<dael> Topic: Wide Review of CSS Fonts 4
<dael> Rossen_: do we want a new CR?
<dael> fantasai: It's a WD
<dael> chris: Yes we do
<dael> github: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4944
<dael> fantasai: We wanted the next as CR but it's not there
<fantasai> s/We/Chris/
<dael> RESOLVED: republish a new WD