[motion-1] Publish an updated WD or move to CR

w3c / csswg-drafts

CSS Working Group Editor Drafts

https://drafts.csswg.org/

Other

4.46k stars 657 forks source link

[motion-1] Publish an updated WD or move to CR #9165

Open SebastianZ opened 1 year ago

SebastianZ commented 1 year ago

Motion Path 1 was last published in 2018.

At the same time it is part of Interop 2023 and received several substantial changes since then, which UAs already started to implement.

Therefore, a new WD should be published. Because it received a bunch of WPT updates and UAs working on interoperability, it may also be moved to CR instead.

Sebastian

svgeesus commented 1 year ago

It would be preferable to publish an updated WD soon. Then call for horizontal review.

The, when requesting CR, a recent WD means that it is easier to claim that the spec has had wide review and that the changes between WD and CR are few.

css-meeting-bot commented 1 year ago

The CSS Working Group just discussed Motion L1, and agreed to the following:

RESOLVED: Add fantasai as editor to Motion L1 and publish WD

The full IRC log of that discussion

<fantasai> Topic: Motion L1
<fantasai> github: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/9165
<fantasai> astearns: Plan is to publish WD, then call for Horizontal Review, and get it to CR asap
<fantasai> astearns: Anyone have anything to add?
<fantasai> astearns: Anyone willing to help Tab?
<fantasai> astearns: It's easy, almost done!
<fantasai> [no one says anything]
<fantasai> fantasai: I can help out
<fantasai> astearns: but not you! j/k it's fine
<fantasai> astearns: propose to add fantasai as editor to Motion 1 so we have backup
<fantasai> astearns: also any objections to new WD of Motion 1?
<fantasai> RESOLVED: Add fantasai as editor to Motion L1 and publish WD

astearns commented 1 year ago

ACTION on the editors to ask for wide review once the WD is published

svgeesus commented 8 months ago

@fantasai how is publication going?