Closed NoelDeMartin closed 5 years ago
The example data has several intentional problems, including the violation of sh:maxCount 1, which gets reported in the block that has sh:sourceConstraintComponent sh:MaxCountConstraintComponent ;
Ok I see, I hadn't read that far yet, my bad. Although I think it's a bit weird that the first example to appear in the document is already invalid.
On the first example of the shacl document (section 1.4) there is an error because it is specified that the property
ex:ssn
can only have one value per person, but in the exampleex:Bob
has two:I'm not doing a PR because I'm not sure if only removing one of the lines is the solution. Seems like this has been done intentionally and it isn't a typo, so there may be something else going on.