Open GeorgFerdinandSchneider opened 3 years ago
I am aware that many users don't understand the correct syntax of prefixes in SHACL-SPARQL. The incomplete example that you highlight may have contributed. I should have added a sentence to clarify that the given snippet needs to be merged with the prefix declaration from https://www.w3.org/TR/shacl/#sparql-prefixes (this is 5.2.1 "Prefix Declarations for SPARQL Queries")
As this spec is finished and not editable, we typically leave such suggestions open as GitHub issues, until a new revision is created in the future.
Dear SHACL team,
In the example provided to describe a SPARQL-constraint, their might be a prefix missing. Some implementations report an error as the query only fires to the triple store if the prefix is registered. Up to know only tested in Stardog 7.4.3.
Currently in the document:
Potential correction:
Best
Georg