Closed anssiko closed 3 years ago
I forgot we're using ReSpec for this spec with no build step.
@xfq what is the latest repo organization convention for ReSpec-based specs?
My understanding is that Spec Prod can handle compilation for both Bikeshed and ReSpec specifications. Even though ReSpec can render in the browser on load it is a better experience for it to be pre-renderer and served as static HTML.
@reillyeon thanks for the reminder. Perhaps we should try Spec Prod here.
@xfq is probably familiar and can help configure.
@kenchris thoughts?
I haven't tried Spec Prod, and I think it is still in the experimental stage, but if you think it's worth a try, I can try it.
Some working groups have developed their own actions. See https://github.com/w3c/aria-practices/blob/master/.github/workflows/deploy.yml for an example.
@xfq per https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-device-apis/2021May/0008.html we should now enable auto-publish for this spec.
@anssiko I have enabled auto-publish in https://github.com/w3c/device-posture/pull/72
Much thanks, I did not notice that you did it already. Closing this issue.
@xfq completed renaming main branches of W3C GitHub repositories for this group.
For this repo we've now defaulted to
gh-pages
.Do we want to use
main
for the source and deploy togh-pages
similarly to other spec repos?Regardless, I think
master
branch is now stale and can be deleted, @xfq?@kenchris for preference.