Closed msporny closed 3 years ago
@iherman wrote:
However. The change also removed the note whereby in the DID model, the order of the items in an ordered set are irrelevant. I just checked and the note was the only place in the document where this fact was mentioned. This note should be reinstated in the text.
The statement was moved to a separate section in the specification in PR #631 -- see https://github.com/w3c/did-core/pull/631/files#diff-0eb547304658805aad788d320f10bf1f292797b5e6d745a3bf617584da017051R1276
PS: I'm really glad that reviewers are paying attention to and are catching these potential oversights. :)
The statement was moved to a separate section in the specification in PR #631 -- see https://github.com/w3c/did-core/pull/631/files#diff-0eb547304658805aad788d320f10bf1f292797b5e6d745a3bf617584da017051R1276
PS: I'm really glad that reviewers are paying attention to and are catching these potential oversights. :)
Sigh... Such tricks make our life difficult 😄
I am fine merging this PR and #631 together... 😉
@iherman wrote:
Such tricks make our life difficult smile
Just making sure everyone is paying attention... :P
Editorial, multiple reviews, changes requested and made, no objections, merging.
Preview | Diff