Closed OR13 closed 3 years ago
@peacekeeper @jricher @msporny
This seems like a mistake.
Nice catch, I agree; that's a bug. I believe this is a hold over from the original write up from @peacekeeper and @jricher -- defer to them to note what's going on in that text.
I agree this feels like a bug. Looks like this was introduced in https://github.com/w3c/did-core/commit/6cb86a38.
I suspect this was meant to say "... in the case of an error in the resolution process, this MUST NOT be empty."
(This would be parallel to the language about dereferencingMetadata in https://w3c.github.io/did-core/#did-url-dereferencing).
@jricher do you agree?
I believe this has been fixed by https://github.com/w3c/did-core/pull/696 and can be closed. @OR13 do you agree?
PR #696 has been merged, waiting on confirmation from @OR13 to close.
yes, this can be closed.
This seems like a mistake... its not like you know the contentType of an Abstract Data Model did document....