Closed rhiaro closed 3 years ago
Thanks @rhiaro,
alsoKnownAs
property but the property itself is still marked as at risk. I seem to remember that, after all, alsoKnownAs
will stay as a bona-fide property, but I did not see any PR or issue on this. It would be good to sync this...Thanks @iherman. I meant to note about the main heading - I definitely wasn't sure about Implementation Guidance, and was looking for feedback on that.
I thought appendices were non-normative by definition, but I can add that explicitly if necessary.
If alsoKnownAs
gets dropped during CR we can certainly remove mentions of it from the appendices.
Editorial, multiple positive reviews, no objections, merging.
For #728
Removed FAQ style headings and responses, trimmed down some text, made some language consistent.
Note - one subsection said DID docs can be used to serve representations of resources, like schemas. I thought the group had resolved that DID docs should have minimal stuff for the specific needs of DIDs, and that any more than this was bad practice (per the
resource=true
discussion) so I've updated it to say to use a DID parameter to do this but didn't mention theresource
parameter as it still doesn't have a spec linked in the Registries. This is a separate commit though so can revert if I got the wrong end of the stick.Also added a paragraph aiming to address #718 about whether the DID subject can change.
Preview | Diff