Open msporny opened 4 months ago
It is not only the DID Core specification. The vocabulary document must be rewritten, too. Almost all the terms in that document should refer to the controller document as for their formal definitions.
(I actually wonder whether that document should not be fundamentally changed. At present, it is not an RDF Vocabulary document, it is an HTML version of the @context
, in some sense. Something to be discussed...)
I have already been getting questions about the controller document and how it relates to a DID document, and I think the best approach will be to just reference controller documents from DID Core, instead of defining DID documents from scratch as it is now.
The issue was discussed in a meeting on 2024-08-14
While this is ready for PR, we shouldn't do the PR until the Controller Document is in Candidate Recommendation, which is expected in November 2024.
This was discussed during the did meeting on 2024-09-05: https://www.w3.org/2024/09/05-did-minutes.html#t04
There is now a Controller Document specification that is on the W3C Recommendation Track through the W3C Verifiable Credentials Working Group. It is, fundamentally, the DID Core specification but generalized to just the document (not resolution) and allows any URL. The DID Core specification might want to use that specification as the base specification (as it can be done in a way that won't change implementations).