Closed theseriesteam closed 2 weeks ago
New DID Method review volunteers, please review this DID Method.
/cc @apuchitnis @stenreijers @gatemezing @esaung @michallis @richardwinputra @adam-burns @Steffytan @MizukiSonoko @rajivrajani @genaris @harleyjackthomas @ajile-in @KDean-Dolphin
My review got as far as the DID Document Definition. The document is non-conformant in at least the following:
version
, created
, and updated
are metadata properties, not core properties (though in metadata it's versionId
, not version
)publicKey
is not a core property and appears to be a substitute for verificationMethod
id
in the verification methods is a DID fragment, not a fully-formed DID URL as requiredpublicKeyHex
is not a supported representation of a public keyI have modified the specification, could you please review again whether it meets the registration requirements ? Thanks!
Thank you for the review, I have modified the method-specific section.
@theseriesteam Please address the registration issues identified in this PR.
Sorry for the late reply, I've updated the document.
DID Method Registration
As a DID method registrant, I have ensured that my DID method registration complies with the following statements:
contactEmail
address [OPTIONAL].verifiableDataRegistry
entry [OPTIONAL].