search

w3c / did-resolution

RELEASED DRAFT: Decentralized Identifier Resolution (DID Resolution) 0.2 Specification
https://w3c.github.io/did-resolution/
Other
17 stars 9 forks source link

Should the definition of a DID Reference be moved to the DID Resolution spec? #21

Open mwherman2000 opened 5 years ago

mwherman2000 commented 5 years ago

Should the definition of a DID Reference be moved to the DID Resolution spec from the DID spec?

NOTE: This is just a placeholder/link to the original issue in the did-spec repo: https://github.com/w3c-ccg/did-spec/issues/167

Let's leave the discussion over there ...at least until this is resolved.

mwherman2000 commented 5 years ago

Being discussed/answered here: https://github.com/w3c-ccg/did-resolution/issues/18#issuecomment-461663993

peacekeeper commented 5 years ago

See my answer over there: https://github.com/w3c-ccg/did-spec/issues/167

Syntax of a DID Reference should be in the main DID spec; how it's used and processed during resolution should be here.

peacekeeper commented 1 month ago

@mwherman2000 Coming back to this after a while, I continue to believe that the definition of DID References / DID URLs / etc. belong in DID Core, not DID Resolution. Also note that there is no such concept as a "DID Reference" in the current versions of either spec.

I also note that a similar issue in DID Core has been closed a while ago: https://github.com/w3c-ccg/did-spec/issues/167

If you agree, I propose we close this issue here as well.