Criteria 36 got rewritten in PR #38, which adds a nice distinction, but loses the point of the original, which was addressing how the desire for actual deletion is addressed, not just the regulatory compliance.
<section>
<h5>Question</h5>
<p>
How are mistakes corrected, and how is the right to be forgotten
addressed? (Note how this creates a tension with immutability,
which may be valuable in 2.7.1 and elsewhere.)
</p>
</section>
<section>
<h5>Responses</h5>
<ol type="A">
<li>
Provable deletion of data is fully supported. Once something is
deleted, nothing internal to the system allows it to be recovered.
</li>
<li>
True, provable deletion is not supported, but deleted data can be
suppressed in jurisdictions where this is required.
</li>
<li>
The VDR is a permanent, immutable record with no support for deletion of any kind.
</li>
</ol>
</section>
<section>
<h5>Relevance</h5>
<p>
?
</p>
</section>
Criteria 36 got rewritten in PR #38, which adds a nice distinction, but loses the point of the original, which was addressing how the desire for actual deletion is addressed, not just the regulatory compliance.