search

w3c / did-rubric

W3C Decentralized Characteristics Rubric v1.0
https://w3c.github.io/did-rubric/
Other
14 stars 16 forks source link

Add links to external evaluation and conference paper. #47

Closed peacekeeper closed 2 years ago

peacekeeper commented 2 years ago

Addresses https://github.com/w3c/did-rubric/issues/45.

Preview | Diff

OR13 commented 2 years ago

@jandrieu @dhh1128 can you please review this PR?

OR13 commented 2 years ago

based on the call today, I suggest moving these sections to the rubric.

Similar to:

https://github.com/w3c/did-imp-guide/pull/29

@jandrieu can you please request changes on this per the conversation on the call today?

peacekeeper commented 2 years ago

I suggest moving these sections to the rubric.

This is the Rubric. Do you mean moving to the Implementation Guide?

iherman commented 2 years ago

The issue was discussed in a meeting on 2021-09-21

View the transcript #### 5.2. Add links to external evaluation and conference paper. (pr did-rubric#47) _See github pull request [did-rubric#47](https://github.com/w3c/did-rubric/pull/47)._ **Joe Andrieu:** Let's talk about #47 - the chairs have an opinion but want to include the rest of the group - adds a reference to external publications - Daniel and I would like to avoid the rubric becoming an index … draw the line by citation to only papers mentioned in a criteria **Ryan Grant:** I have trouble understanding **Joe Andrieu:** All of the criteria need an evaluation. If the cited evaluation is from a published report, then point to author, when, and who paid. … the other was about including part of an evaluation in the rubric. Not opposed to citing where the criteria came from. **Orie Steele:** Agree with Joe. The rubric has a specific format and don't turn it to an index. Link to independent respects somewhere like we did with the SRI evaluation in the IG. **Joe Andrieu:** That sounds great - to put it in the Implementation Guide. **Daniel Burnett:** OK on time Joe?
jandrieu commented 2 years ago

@peacekeeper Yes, I believe @OR13 did mean moving it to the implementation guide.

I think that's a good option.

We'd still love to get any new or updated criteria and/or evaluations from the SBA Research work into the registry. That would earn it a place in the Rubric itself, if that's worth the effort.

We're just trying to hone the core of the rubric as registry to be fundamentally a set of vetted criteria rather than direct guidance on what "objectively" matters in a DID method. In other words, the rubric is about helping people ask the right questions rather than presenting the "best" answers or open ended discussion. We're now in clean up mode to get the current content aligned with the new registration process.

Would that work for you Markus?

OR13 commented 2 years ago

@peacekeeper sorry... yes, on the call there was agreement the imp guide could host these links, like we do for the SRI links.

jandrieu commented 2 years ago

@peacekeeper Looks like the PR for the implementation guide was merged.

Are we good to close?

jandrieu commented 2 years ago

Issue resolved. No objection to closing.

Closing.