search

w3c / did-rubric

W3C Decentralized Characteristics Rubric v1.0
https://w3c.github.io/did-rubric/
Other
14 stars 16 forks source link

Add sections for evals and use cases; cite evals appropriately; update methods considered table #50

Closed dhh1128 closed 2 years ago

dhh1128 commented 2 years ago

Preview | Diff

jandrieu commented 2 years ago

@dhh1128 Looks like we have an error in the CI/CD tooling. It is likely because of a couple of missing <ol> tags (at least I had that problem on the registry PR and your PR likely has the same cruft). You can probably identify the error location by finding a </p> tag followed by a <li> tag. At least that helped with the instances I had fixed.

Alternatively, merge in #49 and pull main back into your PR. That would probably clean it up with less likelihood of a merge conflict.

TallTed commented 2 years ago

@jandrieu -- You need to codefence the HTML tags in your comment, to make them visible to readers.

rxgrant commented 2 years ago

This is stumping the editors and blocking other merges and action right now.

jandrieu commented 2 years ago

This looks good. Merging.

jandrieu commented 2 years ago

Looks like the edits from this merge got smushed.

@rxgrant Let's review and figure out how to get the evaluation citations and related metadata back into the document.

jandrieu commented 2 years ago

@rxgrant and I found that this was a synchronization problem between the main branch, the github.io version, and the /TR version.

We removed the hardcoded publication date (August 26) from the index.html and that eventually got us an updated github.io page, but the TR has not yet updated.

We're going to give it another day to see if the TR updates, but we are also baffled as to why the date in the html would prevent github pages from rendering a new .io page. When we removed the date, it didn't just give us the correct date, it actually pulled in the latest version. How and why that happens seems to be buried in the github pages configuration.

@iherman Can you advise about how we should be doing this? I think we aren't quite configured right for auto publishing and I expect our hack of removing the date may not be the "right" way.

iherman commented 2 years ago

@iherman Can you advise about how we should be doing this? I think we aren't quite configured right for auto publishing and I expect our hack of removing the date may not be the "right" way.

There seem to be some system problems. I have updated the github action script but that did not solve all the issues. See my mail sent to the powers to be (I cc-d you because I was not sure that you can access that archive).

Sigh...