w3c / did-spec-registries

DID Spec Registry (Note)
https://w3c.github.io/did-spec-registries/
Other
117 stars 193 forks source link

add ctid method #559

Closed 617640999 closed 1 month ago

617640999 commented 2 months ago

DID Method Registration

As a DID method registrant, I have ensured that my DID method registration complies with the following statements:

617640999 commented 2 months ago

In method-specific-identifier section I'd like a little more explanation about method-specific-id. Of course, we can know SM3 format by reading SM3 specification, but I'd like some information on length, etc.

Example

method-specific-id = <hexdigit>{64}
hexdigit = [0-9A-F]

I have modified the explanation about method-specific-id in https://github.com/617640999/ctid-did-register/commit/e44aa3d50cf199726122edadd7431d0fc918c1fb, please check again whether it meets the registration requirements. Thanks!

617640999 commented 2 months ago

Is it possible to clearly dissociate the security aspects from the privacy considerations in the last section? Please, try to clearly point out in the security part as present in the document at https://w3c.github.io/did-core/#security-requirements

Thanks for your review, I have updated my registration request to split security and privacy considerations into two points. Please help review again. link to this registration

617640999 commented 1 month ago

Could you please review it for me? @msporny @MizukiSonoko @gatemezing @ajile-in @genaris @KDean-Dolphin @apuchitnis @adam-burns @stenreijers @Steffytan @rajivrajani

617640999 commented 1 month ago

Please add more to the security and privacy considerations sections. For an example look at DID Core:

* https://www.w3.org/TR/did-core/#security-considerations

* https://www.w3.org/TR/did-core/#privacy-considerations

Thank a lot for your review. I have revised it. Please review it again. here is the link

617640999 commented 1 month ago

My registration has been approved twice. Could you please help me merge this PR ? @msporny