Closed aidig closed 3 years ago
@aidig , sincere apologies for not having replied to your feedback.
As the DCAT specification underwent a number of changes, I would like to check with you whether you think this issue is still valid.
At least one of your points (i.e., the use of dcterms:type
with dcat:Resource
) seemed to be addressed by the usage note in §6.4 Class: Cataloged Resource - quoting:
The class of all cataloged resources, the super-class of dcat:Dataset, dcat:DataService, dcat:Catalog and any other member of a dcat:Catalog. This class carries properties common to all cataloged resources, including datasets and data services. It is strongly recommended to use a more specific sub-class. When describing a resource which is not a dcat:Dataset or dcat:DataService, it is recommended to create a suitable sub-class of dcat:Resource, or use dcat:Resource with the dcterms:type property to indicate the specific type.
About the general issue of what should be considered a dataset, I think the discussion moved to https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/1195
Please let us know if anything raised in this issue is yet to be addressed and/or not dealt with in a separate issue.
Please let us know if anything raised in this issue is yet to be addressed and/or not dealt with in a separate issue.
@aidig , as we didn't get any further feedback, we are closing this issue.
Problem statement:
The use of the recommended controlled vocabularies for the classification of dataset/resources is somewhat unclear
Description
Section 5.5 Classifying dataset types states the following:
The property dct:type on dcat:Dataset is inherited from dcat:Resource but since the majority of the recommended controlled vocabularies contain the indiviual 'dataset' this could practically present a number of implementation issues when applied to dcat:Dataset (as stated in section 5.5) without further extension, as the provided codelists are for classifying resourcer on a more general level - datasets being one of the main types....
Here a quick stab at a general mapping between the different resource types (with DCMI as the foundation mapped to selected elements from MD ScopeCodes and DataCite Resource Types)
Related GitHub issue: https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/1186 Related Use Cases from "W3C Editors Draft" 5.8 Scope or type of dataset with a DCAT description [ID8] https://w3c.github.io/dxwg/ucr/#ID8
5.20 Modelling resources different from datasets [ID20] https://w3c.github.io/dxwg/ucr/#ID20
Proposal:
Might section 5.5 simply need reformulating eg:
Also, further advice on the scope of dcat:Dataset might still be required. (Also, check for formal definition/scope note consistency)