search

w3c / dxwg

Data Catalog Vocabulary (DCAT)
https://w3c.github.io/dxwg/dcat/
Other
152 stars 47 forks source link

Add distribution digest #1323

Closed andrea-perego closed 3 years ago

andrea-perego commented 3 years ago

Relevant issue: https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/1287

Summary of changes:

Preview of the newly added sections:

Diff: https://services.w3.org/htmldiff?doc1=https%3A%2F%2Fw3c.github.io%2Fdxwg%2Fdcat%2F&doc2=https%3A%2F%2Fraw.githack.com%2Fw3c%2Fdxwg%2Fdcat-distribution-digest%2Fdcat%2Findex.html

agbeltran commented 3 years ago

thanks for addressing my previous comments @andrea-perego - I suggest we add a reference to https://spdx.dev in addition to the vocabulary (as it provides a lot more information about the vocabulary and its governance)

riannella commented 3 years ago

@agbeltran I agree that the definition provided by SPDX is not clear (authenticity V integrity) - but since we are reusing their property then we have to use the same definition. Perhaps we should make this feedback available to the SPDX team?

agbeltran commented 3 years ago

@riannella I agree we should feed this back to the SPDX community, but the changes we are making in the definition are more clarifications than changing the essense of the property, so I don't think we need to copy the definition verbatim (and we should say that the definition is based on SPDX) - what do others think?

riannella commented 3 years ago

@riannella I agree we should feed this back to the SPDX community, but the changes we are making in the definition are more clarifications than changing the essense of the property, so I don't think we need to copy the definition verbatim (and we should say that the definition is based on SPDX) - what do others think?

Done: https://github.com/spdx/spdx-spec/issues/500

I am happy for us to adopt this update now.

agbeltran commented 3 years ago

@riannella I agree we should feed this back to the SPDX community, but the changes we are making in the definition are more clarifications than changing the essense of the property, so I don't think we need to copy the definition verbatim (and we should say that the definition is based on SPDX) - what do others think?

Done: spdx/spdx-spec#500

I am happy for us to adopt this update now.

that's brilliant - thanks @riannella

andrea-perego commented 3 years ago

thanks for addressing my previous comments @andrea-perego - I suggest we add a reference to https://spdx.dev in addition to the vocabulary (as it provides a lot more information about the vocabulary and its governance)

Thanks, @agbeltran . Could you please suggest the actual revision to be made?

BTW, I just saw that now https://spdx.org/ (pointing to the old Web site) redirects to https://spdx.dev/ (the new one), so probably this revision is no longer needed.

andrea-perego commented 3 years ago

@riannella I agree we should feed this back to the SPDX community, but the changes we are making in the definition are more clarifications than changing the essense of the property, so I don't think we need to copy the definition verbatim (and we should say that the definition is based on SPDX) - what do others think?

Done: spdx/spdx-spec#500 I am happy for us to adopt this update now.

that's brilliant - thanks @riannella

Thanks, @agbeltran & @riannella .

Revision implemented via commit https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/pull/1323/commits/8c64f98ab7bed4d157335bde8df754da94594fac

andrea-perego commented 3 years ago

thanks for addressing my previous comments @andrea-perego - I suggest we add a reference to https://spdx.dev in addition to the vocabulary (as it provides a lot more information about the vocabulary and its governance)

Thanks, @agbeltran . Could you please suggest the actual revision to be made?

BTW, I just saw that now https://spdx.org/ (pointing to the old Web site) redirects to https://spdx.dev/ (the new one), so probably this revision is no longer needed.

@agbeltran , I'm now going to merge this PR, as this is just an editorial revision that can be implemented in a new PR.