Closed riccardoAlbertoni closed 2 years ago
I can't recall what the intention was here. I suggest deleting that line. No such artefact exists. (FWIW this item now has a DOI https://doi.org/10.25919/5b4d2b83cbf2d )
I can't recall what the intention was here. I suggest deleting that line. No such artefact exists. (FWIW this item now has a DOI https://doi.org/10.25919/5b4d2b83cbf2d )
@dr-shorthair : I have deleted the line and all the statements related to :d33937.owl . See pr #1424. Is this ok for you?
I am not sure to understand the use of
dcterms:reference
as in example 54 https://www.w3.org/TR/2021/WD-vocab-dcat-3-20210504/where :d33937.owl seems to be the ontology followed by the dataset.
@dr-shorthair: Perhaps a
dcterms:conformsTo
would be a better choice? Am I missing anything?In case we decide to keep the references, it is possible that we need to add the inverse as discussed in https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/pull/1410#issuecomment-942665724