search

w3c / dxwg

Data Catalog Vocabulary (DCAT)
https://w3c.github.io/dxwg/dcat/
Other
149 stars 47 forks source link

Add example on the use of dcterms:conformsTo with dcat:CatalogRecord #1488

Closed andrea-perego closed 2 years ago

andrea-perego commented 2 years ago

Summary of changes:

Preview: https://raw.githack.com/w3c/dxwg/dcat-ex-record-schema/dcat/index.html#ex-catalog-record-schema

Diff: https://services.w3.org/htmldiff?doc1=https%3A%2F%2Fw3c.github.io%2Fdxwg%2Fdcat%2F&doc2=https%3A%2F%2Fraw.githack.com%2Fw3c%2Fdxwg%2Fdcat-ex-record-schema%2Fdcat%2Findex.html

riccardoAlbertoni commented 2 years ago

We might want to add this addition to the change History. Perhaps, we can do it after merging #1486, so that we don't risk conflicts between these two PRs.

andrea-perego commented 2 years ago

@riccardoAlbertoni said:

We might want to add this addition to the change History. Perhaps, we can do it after merging #1486, so that we don't risk conflicts between these two PRs.

Agreed. Let's keep this on hold until #1486 is merged.

andrea-perego commented 2 years ago

@riccardoAlbertoni said:

We might want to add this addition to the change History. Perhaps, we can do it after merging #1486, so that we don't risk conflicts between these two PRs.

Agreed. Let's keep this on hold until #1486 is merged.

I updated the changelog, and I also took the opportunity to fix some typos and editorial issues. I also run the US spellchecker.

Some of the typos concern two property definitions not in the DCAT namespace. So the fixes should be reflected also in the corresponding RDF files.

The relevant properties are:

riccardoAlbertoni commented 2 years ago

I guess we want to merge the changes to the HTML pretty soon. So I would suggest dealing with the DCAT RDF in a new PR, or even directly in the #1482 to avoid conflict among PRs.

@riccardoAlbertoni said:

We might want to add this addition to the change History. Perhaps, we can do it after merging #1486, so that we don't risk conflicts between these two PRs.

Agreed. Let's keep this on hold until #1486 is merged.

I updated the changelog, and I also took the opportunity to fix some typos and editorial issues. I also run the US spellchecker.

Some of the typos concern two property definitions not in the DCAT namespace. So the fixes should be reflected also in the corresponding RDF files.

The relevant properties are:

  • dcterms:accrualPeriodicity in §6.6.2 Property: frequency. Current definition:

    The frequency at which dataset is published.

    New definition:

    The frequency at which a dataset is published.

  • spdx:checksumValue in §6.17.2 Property: checksum value. Current definition:

    The checksumValue property provides a lower case hexidecimal encoded digest value produced using a specific algorithm [[SPDX]].

    New definition:

    The checksumValue property provides a lowercase hexadecimal encoded digest value produced using a specific algorithm [[SPDX]]."

andrea-perego commented 2 years ago

@riccardoAlbertoni scripsit:

I guess we want to merge the changes to the HTML pretty soon. So I would suggest dealing with the DCAT RDF in a new PR, or even directly in the #1482 to avoid conflict among PRs.

Yes, this was just meant to be a heads-up. And doing the fix in the RDF might not be so straightforward, as the RDF files with external properties / classes are still those of DCAT2.

andrea-perego commented 2 years ago

I created a PR (https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/pull/1491) on top of this one to address issue https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/1490

If you think that the proposal in PR https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/pull/1491 makes sense, I suggest we wait to merge this one. Otherwise, I'll create another one.