Closed riccardoAlbertoni closed 1 year ago
@agreiner wrote:
Do you mean to accept only the changes to the first paragraph? There's a lot more that differs in my suggestion. (sorry)
@agreiner - Sorry...It seems I have forgot to provide the proper preview and diff. This PR aims at considering all your changes, see the links below. Though pairwise text comparison is not among my best skill and a double check is more than welcome.
I think you did an excellent job!
This Pr implements and relaborates suggestions made in issue #1526
This implements suggestions made by @agreiner on Pr #1578. @agreiner: A huge thank for revising Pr #1578. I like that now the section provides more explicit guidance than before, so I am inclined to accept your proposal.
@davebrowning, @pchampin, @andrea-perego (Who had accepted PR#1578 already): are you comfortable with this rephrasing? Please provide your GIT Review.