When requesting a representation, a client must be able to specify which profile it prefers the representation to adhere to. This information about the requested profile is not a replacement for content type (e. g. application/xml), language (e. g. zh-Hant) or any other negotiated dimension of the representation. [ID5] (5.5)

w3c / dxwg

Data Catalog Vocabulary (DCAT)

https://w3c.github.io/dxwg/dcat/

Other

153 stars 47 forks source link

When requesting a representation, a client must be able to specify which profile it prefers the representation to adhere to. This information about the requested profile is not a replacement for content type (e. g. application/xml), language (e. g. zh-Hant) or any other negotiated dimension of the representation. [ID5] (5.5) #289

Open nicholascar opened 6 years ago

nicholascar commented 6 years ago

Entered from Google Doc.

Suggested re-wording: "When requesting a representation, a client must be able to specify which profile it prefers the representation to adhere to. This information about the requested profile is not a replacement for content type (e. g. application/xml), language (e. g. zh-Hant) or any other negotiated dimension of the representation."

aisaac commented 6 years ago

Changing title from "Invocation of a profile may be by profile name, a schema choice, an encoding, and/or a language. (schema? And assume that encoding is type as in type="application/xml".) [ID5] (5.5)" to "When requesting a representation, a client must be able to specify which profile it prefers the representation to adhere to. This information about the requested profile is not a replacement for content type (e. g. application/xml), language (e. g. zh-Hant) or any other negotiated dimension of the representation."

nicholascar commented 5 years ago

De-tagging as profile-negotiation as dealt with by its point of view