search

w3c / dxwg

Data Catalog Vocabulary (DCAT)
https://w3c.github.io/dxwg/dcat/
Other
150 stars 47 forks source link

DCAT: Request for clarification on dcat:endpointDescription #960

Open andrea-perego opened 5 years ago

andrea-perego commented 5 years ago

Feedback submitted by Yves Coene.

See: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-dxwg-comments/2019May/0003.html

The mail above includes a preliminary reply, to be validated / confirmed by the WG.

dr-shorthair commented 5 years ago

The only thing I would add is to make clear that the endpointDescription describes the instance, not the type. e.g. it is the GetCapabilities response, not the WFS spec.

davebrowning commented 5 years ago

I read this as meaning we don't need to change the Rec -but would be good to provide that clarity to the provider of the feedback, @andrea-perego ?

smrgeoinfo commented 5 years ago

Perhaps the examples from the e-mail could be incorporated into the text to show some valid approaches to endpoint description?

davebrowning commented 5 years ago

Perhaps the examples from the e-mail could be incorporated into the text to show some valid approaches to endpoint description?

That's a good idea - or it could be in a primer (if we can resource writing one...). We may be a bit short of effort/time to get this done for this version though - we'll keep it under review.

riccardoAlbertoni commented 5 years ago

+1 to have it in a primer (if we can resource writing one...).

davebrowning commented 5 years ago

So to summarise the state of this issue, the original reply to the feedback (in May) has been validated by this discussion, with some minor text improvements that can be incorporated in the future. In addition, the examples would be good to incorporate in some further document. If that's all agreed, I propose we move this to 'future work'.