Closed mattgarrish closed 1 year ago
I just remembered I didn't update the preview/diff links in the first message (copied from another pull request). They should work correctly now.
Thanks, LGTM!
@gregoriopellegrino @GeorgeKerscher @avneeshsingh @clapierre, as "core" contributors to the a11y documents, any objections to merge this PR?
I think we should merge it.
As far as I know, we're still waiting on an issue with the copyright line to be fixed @GeorgeKerscher. Until then, I think any merge attempts will fail to publish in the backend system. I'll get this merged once I get the green light from @iherman.
Sorry, I missed that Ivan asked if you're okay to merge. I'll still let him figure out when to do it.
As far as I know, we're still waiting on an issue with the copyright line to be fixed @GeorgeKerscher. Until then, I think any merge attempts will fail to publish in the backend system. I'll get this merged once I get the green light from @iherman.
Yes, it is probably better to wait for the copyright issue to be solved before we merge this (the Rec-track documents would be fine because the automatic publishing is switched off anyway but this merge would also affect a bunch of notes). But the promise was to settle that this week, so we should be in the clean as soon as doable.
Thanks for the approval, @GeorgeKerscher
Adds a new acknowledgements file for the accessibility spec along with the dedication.