Closed mattgarrish closed 1 year ago
If we do that, it should definitely be done for the RS
Ya, there are just no other changes to that spec in the bunch we're proposing. But it will eventually have to be done.
@iherman I've made a few other tweaks to this PR after looking at the metadata again:
Since we were saying on the last call that we may merge PRs without publishing for a while, I've also updated the RS spec. Even if we don't publish it with the others, we might as well get this functional stuff out of the way. I'm going to find the PR that modified the change logs and adjust it to use details elements, too (but not add a new section for changes since REC, since we don't have any yet).
I think you should also comment out the EPUB format reference. There is no use of regenerating it every time, only when we publish a consolidated version...
Otherwise 👍
As the title says.
Do we also want to republish the RS spec at the same time just to update the group info?
Preview | Diff