Open hober opened 6 months ago
I was going to suggest the epub4 repository could just be deleted as we never used it, but then I discovered all the neat stuff it does...
No strong opinion one way or the other on changing repository names. The diffs and revision histories cited in the older revisions broke ages ago when we moved off google code and then changed a bunch of labels, so I can't imagine it could make things any worse.
My worry with the epub-spec
->epub
renaming is twofold.
At this moment, I'd prefer not to make the change. The possible set of troubles does not seem to be worth it.
I also seem to recall we changed from the original "epub-revision" name from the idpf days to "epub-specs" because we added "epub-tests" and didn't want too generic a name. That's why I'm fine either way on this.
(or w3c/epub3, given w3c/epub4 also exists)