The id was pub-xml-non-validating_invalid, but the test itself was actually on the fact that a comment in the package file was hiding the navigation file (although the comment itself was also erroneous). The description of the test was erroneous, as well as the test name. This PR fixes these
This test is, in fact, the equivalent of what is mentioned in PR #70, although that one is now extremely outdated. I will close that PR in favor of this one.
There was a discrepancy in an XML test.
pub-xml-non-validating_invalid, but the test itself was actually on the fact that a comment in the package file was hiding the navigation file (although the comment itself was also erroneous). The description of the test was erroneous, as well as the test name. This PR fixes thesecc @dauwhe