Could the filters just be generalizing the content for certain keywords to flag? If so, then monitoring, or validators can remedy the situation. If monitoring, then a website's email on file can receive an email with the error, then website can send a report for analysis. Validators can be people, code, and/or smart contracts to solve the flagging issue by marking it as valid or not; in an odd number setting 2 out of 3, or 3 out of 5, etc. validators do not think it's an issue, then errors are removed. It's understood that the resources are mainly code and scripts, all applicable solutions to ease the potentially dangerous content warnings would be beneficial on websites that do not produce them.
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Issues with https://validator.w3.org/feed/check.cgi?url=https%3A%2F%2Fvitalytennant.com%2Ffeed%2F#l1585 - https://vitalytennant.com/feed/ being flagged for potentially dangerous content, when it isn't.
E.G.; Screenshot 1: https://prnt.sc/4Z1NEC3SYm0f Screenshot 2: https://prnt.sc/j0cdWJ1-wy2g
Describe the solution you'd like
Could the filters just be generalizing the content for certain keywords to flag? If so, then monitoring, or validators can remedy the situation. If monitoring, then a website's email on file can receive an email with the error, then website can send a report for analysis. Validators can be people, code, and/or smart contracts to solve the flagging issue by marking it as valid or not; in an odd number setting 2 out of 3, or 3 out of 5, etc. validators do not think it's an issue, then errors are removed. It's understood that the resources are mainly code and scripts, all applicable solutions to ease the potentially dangerous content warnings would be beneficial on websites that do not produce them.
Thank you in advance.
Regards.