When you are using mask-composite with mask-repeat=no-repeat, the area outside the mask bounds (as given by mask-size) is treated as transparent. In certain cases, I would have liked the option to treat the outside area as opaque instead. E.g. I want to use an "inverse" of a mask (all alpha inverted) as one of the layers, but for it to work, all area outside the mask-size should have been inverted. I've run into a few cases where I've needed to use 1-2 extra full-size masks to mimic the effect. My proposal would be to add a fill option to mask-repeat, which behaves like no-repeat except filling the outside area with 100% opacity instead of 0% opacity.
When you are using
mask-compositewithmask-repeat=no-repeat, the area outside the mask bounds (as given bymask-size) is treated as transparent. In certain cases, I would have liked the option to treat the outside area as opaque instead. E.g. I want to use an "inverse" of a mask (all alpha inverted) as one of the layers, but for it to work, all area outside the mask-size should have been inverted. I've run into a few cases where I've needed to use 1-2 extra full-size masks to mimic the effect. My proposal would be to add afilloption tomask-repeat, which behaves likeno-repeatexcept filling the outside area with 100% opacity instead of 0% opacity.