Closed fantasai closed 3 months ago
This came from the discussion we just had on https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/8924
Not sure what there is to discuss. Yes, these specs should be corrected to say Animation type
.
Getting them active editors and getting them published is good, but entirely separate to this routine maintenance issue.
The CSS Working Group just discussed [FXTF] Update “Animatable” lines to “Animation type” in all propdef tables
.
What it says in the title.
Also we need to republish, but a lot of these drafts aren't actively edited and have changes besides this one, so someone needs to take responsibility for figuring out what's going on.