Open cdoublev opened 9 months ago
I think && was lost in this commit.
&&
Name: mask-border-slice Value: [ <number> | <percentage> ]{1,4} fill? See the border-image-slice property [CSS3BG] for the definitions of the property values.
Name: mask-border-slice Value: [ <number> | <percentage> ]{1,4} fill?
mask-border-slice
[ <number> | <percentage> ]{1,4} fill?
See the border-image-slice property [CSS3BG] for the definitions of the property values.
border-image-slice
https://drafts.fxtf.org/css-masking-1/#propdef-mask-border-slice
Name: border-image-slice Value: [<number [0,∞]> | <percentage [0,∞]>]{1,4} && fill?
[<number [0,∞]> | <percentage [0,∞]>]{1,4} && fill?
https://drafts.csswg.org/css-backgrounds-3/#propdef-border-image-slice
The following longhand pairs also have different initial values, different animation types, and numeric CSS types are constrained for one but not the other:
border-image-width
mask-border-width
border-image-outset
mask-border-outset
I am not sure (all) these differences are intentional.
svgeesus marked as non substantive for IPR from ash-nazg.
I think
&&
was lost in this commit.https://drafts.fxtf.org/css-masking-1/#propdef-mask-border-slice
https://drafts.csswg.org/css-backgrounds-3/#propdef-border-image-slice
The following longhand pairs also have different initial values, different animation types, and numeric CSS types are constrained for one but not the other:
border-image-slice
andmask-border-slice
border-image-width
andmask-border-width
border-image-outset
andmask-border-outset
I am not sure (all) these differences are intentional.