Closed anssiko closed 5 years ago
PTAL @reillyeon.
This is an editorial change. I feel e.g. ISSUE-13 is confusing and not appropriate inline, so proposing we remove all inline issues for consistency, farm them to GH issues (ReSpec pulls them dynamically from there anyways).
(FYI @xfq - it seems I can't assign reviewers via GH UI for this spec, can you fine-tune the GH configuration?)
@plehegar, I'm looking at 9fbfe7565fbbfe6215fbad633abacc8cb1003c58 and I don't see a motivation for adding issue references directly into the specification. Is there a W3C policy on this?
@reillyeon , there is no policy on it. It was a simple matter of making sure folks were aware of issues in the past. Fine to be removed imho.
@anssiko , I see you have admin rights on the repo, so you should be fine to do what you need.
Thanks for the review. No concerns to drop the inline issues so merging this now.
Fix #21