Open vivienlacourba opened 1 year ago
to make sure I parse this right, the idea is that archived repos wouldn't be displayed in group pages at the moment; and if one day they would be, it would be done based on their exposed attribute, with the same defaults as non-archived repos?
I would have a slight preference for the default for archived repos to be exposed: false
, but since that's not a current problem, I'm not sure it matters all that much
to make sure I parse this right, the idea is that archived repos wouldn't be displayed in group pages at the moment; and if one day they would be, it would be done based on their exposed attribute, with the same defaults as non-archived repos?
That's right.
The
exposed
boolean inw3c.json
has some default value for public and private repos but it is not clear how it applies to archived repos.With @plehegar we thought that W3C Groups would not want to advertise their private repositories on their group page and did not thought of any use cases where they would.
My suggestion is that the
exposed
bit is orthogonal to thearchived
state, in which case it is simply an implementation decision for the groups page to decide whether to include, display separately or simply omit archived repos altogether. And if we were to later display archived repos on groups pages then we would honor theirexposed
value.@deniak, @plehegar, @dontcallmedom does that sounds good to you?