Open aphillips opened 5 months ago
Hi @aphillips ,
Some of the i18n-activity issues would get a subset of the following labels: 'tf:i18n-sealreq', 'ig:i18n', 'wg:i18n-core', 'tf:i18n-hlreq', 'tf:i18n-jlreq', 'tf:i18n-mlreq', 'tf:i18n-tlreq'.
Is that desired or should I filter those out?
@plehegar I think you can filter those. We already have tags explicitly for that and we know where those issues come from in any event.
ok, we're not automatic yet but I have code that populated the horizontal issues, for example:
The group attribution is based on what a repository claims. Those claims are processed and gathered and are used in various context.
If the current result seems satisfying, I will:
would it be useful to have labels for outside organizations, like 'whatwg', 'ietf' ?
The examples (distributed-tracing and wicg) look good!
I think that outside organizations would be useful, notably whatwg
short update: I added the handling for 'whatwg'. IETF isn't much of a use case yet.
Looks pretty good. I noticed a bug: s:infra
didn't get picked up as whatwg
one remaining TODO: add the Group even if the issue doesn't link to another GH repo yet, eg https://github.com/w3c/i18n-activity/issues/192
The I18N WG would like to request a feature. We would like HR issues to be labeled with the working group.
We notice that a number of working groups create more than one spec. These get different
s:shortname
labels in our repo. It would be nice to be able to find all issues associated with a specific working group later, such as when we have a joint call or meeting with them.We want to be able to search the i18n-activity repo (where our horizontal review issues are located) for a label by working group. For example, if we wanted to look up all issues for the VC working group, we would use a query like:
This is in response to w3c/i18n-actions#69. @plehegar and I traded email about it also.