search

w3c / i18n-activity

Home pages, charters, style-guides, and similar documents related to the W3C Internationalization Activity.
66 stars 23 forks source link

Refer to RFC 3987 instead of RFC 3986 #934

Open fsasaki opened 4 years ago

fsasaki commented 4 years ago

This is a tracker issue. Only discuss things here if they are i18n group internal meta-discussions about the issue. Contribute to the actual discussion at the following link:

§ https://github.com/w3c/miniapp-addressing/issues/1

aphillips commented 4 years ago

It's been a while since we visited this topic. Do we need to consider WHATWG's URL spec again?

fsasaki commented 4 years ago

Maybe I am not up to date with this topic. Years ago our group always pushed for references to RFC 3987, as a replacement for references to RFC 3986. Has this changed?

aphillips commented 4 years ago

No, it hasn't. But IRI remains a little controversial. That WHATWG doc was supposed to resolve that. In any case, my comment was basically asking "Has this changed?" :-)

fsasaki commented 4 years ago

OK, I see. Looking at https://url.spec.whatwg.org/ , it seems that asking for an RFC 3987 reference and the term "IRI" to be used is not likely to be welcomed.

plehegar commented 3 years ago

Issue got transferred to a new repo.