Closed aphillips closed 1 year ago
We should remove it if we don't come up with anyone to acknowledge - it's just commented out boilerplate text for now. The names are not relevant to this glossary.
Do you know where it came from? If it's a holdover from elsewhere, we should just remove it.
Looking at the names, I thought it came from string-meta, so I took a look and it confirmed my suspicions: https://github.com/w3c/string-meta/blob/3ed0424c4b2a529b44df0e2cd33e72eaac0ad86d/index.html#L1345
The names have been removed in https://github.com/w3c/i18n-glossary/pull/27/files
I removed the whole thing in #34. We can restore it if we need it in the future.
PS> Thanks @xfq for finding the origin!!!
The acknowledgements section of the glossary is commented out. Should it be removed or restored?