Closed torgo closed 6 months ago
Thanks @torgo.
When do you need the review by? I have assigned a temporary date for now of 18 April. Let me know if you need it sooner.
@torgo
I don't think this document falls into these categories, however if you would prefer me to fill this out I can do so
It's generally a good idea to do a self-review, but not a requirement. Filling in the self-review gives our group some place to start (depending on the responses).
It would be great if it could be done before the AC meeting on the 8-9 of April since I'm going to be presenting the doc there, but I totally understand if it's not possible. I will fill ou the self-review and amend the request.
Name of your specification
Privacy Principles
URL of your specification
https://www.w3.org/TR/2024/DNOTE-privacy-principles-20240226/
Does your specification include an Internationalization Considerations section?
When does the review need to be finished?
We are looking to transition this document to a w3c statement by this summer.
What has changed since any previous review?
This document has not previously been reviewed for any i18n issues.
Please point to the results of your own self-review
https://github.com/w3ctag/privacy-principles/blob/main/i18n-checklist-response
Where and how should the i18n WG raise issues?
Please raise issues in our repo:
Pointer to any explainer for the spec
https://github.com/w3ctag/privacy-principles/
Other comments
We are in new territory with this kind of wide review request for statement track documents. I'm happy to make this request in another way or to add additional information to this request as required. Thanks!