Candidate Recommendation

[palemieux]

---

Preview | Diff

[css-meeting-bot]

The Timed Text Working Group just discussed CR1 Exit Criteria, and agreed to the following:

• SUMMARY: Proceed as-is

The full IRC log of that discussion

<nigel> Subtopic: CR1 Exit Criteria
<nigel> github: https://github.com/w3c/imsc-hrm/pull/59
<nigel> Nigel: Is this still a draft PR?
<nigel> Pierre: Yes, to prevent merging, as much as anything else.
<nigel> .. The outstanding thing is how to label at-risk features.
<nigel> .. I'm not happy with it.
<nigel> .. I think we should go back to a simple statement rather than linking to issues.
<nigel> .. It's confusing, and doesn't bring us anything because we don't have many features at risk.
<nigel> q+
<nigel> .. I propose to remove those links.
<nigel> ack nb
<nigel> ack n
<nigel> Nigel: I'm not sure what the problem is - I'm actually quite happy with it as it stands.
<nigel> Pierre: OK, what about you Atsushi?
<nigel> Atsushi: I don't have objections
<nigel> Pierre: Okay, maybe we should resolve those threads and call it done.
<nigel> SUMMARY: Proceed as-is

[himorin]

+1 to go.

Just for memo, and I'm not sure whether we will get comment or not, but we may be asked about what kind of verification to be performed by implementation? (e.g. difference from one verification implementation over two sets of data from independent implementations, which we said during discussion)

[himorin]

@palemieux @nigelmegitt could you merge this PR?

• target publication date: 2023-06-22
• minimum crEnd (28days): 2023-07-20

[palemieux]

@himorin Merged and tagged

[himorin]

Thank you!