changes for process 2021 style

w3c / jlreq

Text Layout Requirements for Japanese

https://w3c.github.io/jlreq/

Other

101 stars 17 forks source link

changes for process 2021 style #307

Closed himorin closed 2 years ago

himorin commented 3 years ago

added w3cid for ones found
changed html title as https://github.com/w3c/clreq/pull/390

Preview | Diff

himorin commented 3 years ago

w3cid : The editors'/authors' names must be listed, with attribute data-editor-id="@@". from https://www.w3.org/pubrules/doc/rules/?profile=WG-NOTE#editorSection

r12a commented 3 years ago

I believe that the id has to be present ONLY for those people who are likely to actually publish the document, rather than for all editors (which probably means just you and me). Do you know of any other reason for posting people's ids?

himorin commented 3 years ago

I totally have no idea on w3cid restriction...

r12a commented 3 years ago

I'll ask Denis for clarification.

himorin commented 2 years ago

discussed with @kidayasuo for a while,,, how about to move ones actively worked at the development of 2nd edition to authors?

r12a commented 2 years ago

Mm. Then we'd have the possibly tricky problem of deciding in some cases who is an author and who is an editor, unless everyone is added to the author list, and editors (defined as people who work on the HTML) are added to both lists.

I originally thought we could keep things simple by not adding unnecessary information to the source, but i fear that splitting the information would only increase the administrative work for us. Maybe it's best just to add everyone's w3cid, after all, and leave things as they are?? I don't imagine that we have to worry about anyone on the list unexpectedly publishing the document.

kidayasuo commented 2 years ago

@r12a I tend to agree. I do not like the idea of dividing people based on if they have w3cid. Can we change the document system if it mandates the w3cid that not necessarily all have? What is the benefit of the work of finding past editors' contact emails, writing them and asking a favour of creating a w3cid which was not necessary at the time they participated? They might not be reachable or they do not respond to the email quickly.

r12a commented 2 years ago

Let me check with the webmaster.

himorin commented 2 years ago

confirmed working with pubrules. remaining errors are followings, both of which are duplicated between en and ja. So I'll add another commit to change ja one like with adding j at the last (e.g. d8e1224j)

Duplicate ID “d8e1224”.
Duplicate ID “d8e1230”.

himorin commented 2 years ago

requesting review with this. I confirm this could pass updated pubrules.