w3c / json-ld-framing

JSON-LD 1.1 Framing Specification
https://w3c.github.io/json-ld-framing/
Other
24 stars 20 forks source link

IANA profile should be `frame` not `framed` #132

Closed VladimirAlexiev closed 1 month ago

VladimirAlexiev commented 1 year ago

https://www.w3.org/TR/json-ld11-framing/#iana-considerations:

http://www.w3.org/ns/json-ld#framed To specify a JSON-LD Frame. The http://www.w3.org/ns/json-ld#framed SHOULD be used when serving and requesting a JSON-LD frame document.

https://w3c.github.io/json-ld-syntax/#application-ld-json

This specification defines six values for the profile parameter. http://www.w3.org/ns/json-ld#frame To request or specify a JSON-LD frame document. http://www.w3.org/ns/json-ld#framed To request or specify framed JSON-LD document form.

gkellogg commented 1 year ago

Thanks for noticing this. I don't recall right now why we had a separate IANA considerations section in the Framing document, as it is redundant with that from the Syntax document, and as you point out, inconsistent.

I think the corrective action is the just make the Framing document consistent with the Syntax document for this particular profile parameter in an Erratum.

gkellogg commented 1 year ago

Summary: Update IANA considerations to make thehttp://www.w3.org/ns/json-ld#frame parameter required and change from http://www.w3.org/ns/json-ld#frame, which was inaccurate and inconsistent with the same definition in the with the narrative text and with the same definition in JSON-LD11.

gkellogg commented 1 year ago

I'm re-opening this to undo the normative change to the ReSpec source to allow for future publication without going through the CR cycle again.

gkellogg commented 1 year ago

The lines noted in #137 should be added back when ready for a new CR phase.

VladimirAlexiev commented 1 month ago

hi @gkellogg I'm closing this based on your latest commit. Please reopen if I'm wrong