Closed gkellogg closed 8 months ago
Hm. Why frame
instead of framed
?
The "framed" IRI was intended to indicate a JSON-LD document that was the result of framing, whereas the "frame" IRI was intended to describe a JSON-LD document that can be used as a frame. This is why it's a "required" parameter, as frames use different keywords than normal JSON-LD documents, and have a specific purpose. I don't expect that the world will change so that every frame document now comes with such a parameter; static site builders really have no way to do this, but it makes sense for the spec to be accurate in its description.
I wish multiple +
had already been approved.
It seems to me, this media type would be better application/frame+ld+json
,
being a subtype of application/ld+json
,
being a subtype of application/json
.
rather than optinoal, and use "frame" instead of "framed".
For #132.
Preview | Diff