Closed gkellogg closed 5 years ago
For #172.
Is it intended that we still have a broken reference to the removed section (at the end of section 5)?
Is it intended that we still have a broken reference to the removed section (at the end of section 5)?
No, of course not. This was something dangling between the two different PRs, apparently. Fixed in 06505e323907fd50662abaea06666b4959cfce4d.
This reverts w3c/json-ld-api#66, which we can do because of #204.
Preview | Diff