Closed pchampin closed 4 years ago
The next sentence the definition of @type
you cite says "Within an expanded term definition, its value may also be either @id
or @vocab
." Is this not adequate?
Sorry, the title of the issue is not very explicit.
I was referring to this kind of context:
{
"@context" {
"@type": { "@container": "@set" }
}
}
which is not covered by 9.16, AFAICT.
WG agrees
This will be tricky, because the use of
@type
in a context definition is very different different from its use in other context. In particular, the sentenceis not true for the "context definition" case...