Open lsimichael opened 4 years ago
Hi, I have an idea for a new feature. I see there is a feature freeze for 1.1 but do not know how to submit a feature for 1.2
I am working with W3C's SHACL and there can be deeply nested nodes and properties. Each sh:node is a sh:NodeShape and each sh:property is a sh:PropertyShape, and it gets very repetitive to write out those @type
s each time.
I would like to be able to define a default @type
for entities in the @context of a regular JSON-LD document, using the @default
keyword. The default would be applied no matter how deeply nested.
I have read a discussion before that JSON-LD core syntax is not for adding information, because that is only for framing. But I hope that can be reconsidered. In my opinion this is not adding, just rearranging, since the information is provided in the @context.
(If this is impossible in the core syntax, even in a future 1.2 version, then perhaps there could be modifications made to framing to model infinite nesting.)
Here's an example in 1.1 syntax:
{
"@context": {
"schema": "http://schema.org/",
"sh": "https://www.w3.org/TR/shacl/",
"path": {
"@id": "sh:path",
"@type": "@id"
},
"class": {
"@id": "sh:class",
"@type": "@id"
},
"property": "sh:property",
"node": "sh:node"
},
"@type": "sh:NodeShape",
"class": "schema:Article",
"property": [{
"@type": "sh:PropertyShape",
"path": "schema:author"
}, {
"@type": "sh:PropertyShape",
"path": "schema:headline"
}, {
"@type": "sh:PropertyShape",
"path": "schema:interactionStatistic",
"node": {
"@type": "sh:NodeShape",
"class": "schema:InteractionCounter",
"property": [{
"@type": "PropertyShape",
"path": "schema:userInteractionCount"
}, {
"@type": "PropertyShape",
"path": "schema:interactionType",
"node": {
"class": "schema:CommentAction"
}
}]
}
}]
}
And below would be my preferred syntax, with @default
values provided in the @context.
{
"@context": {
"schema": "http://schema.org/",
"sh": "https://www.w3.org/TR/shacl/",
"path": {
"@id": "sh:path",
"@type": "@id"
},
"class": {
"@id": "sh:class",
"@type": "@id"
},
"property": {
"@id": "sh:property",
"@type": "sh:class",
"@default": {
"@type": "sh:PropertyShape"
}
},
"node": {
"@id": "sh:node",
"@type": "sh:path",
"@default": {
"@type": "sh:NodeShape"
}
}
},
"@type": "sh:NodeShape",
"class": "schema:Article",
"property": [
"schema:author",
"schema:headline", {
"path": "schema:interactionStatistic",
"node": {
"class": "schema:InteractionCounter",
"property": [
"schema:userInteractionCount", {
"path": "schema:interactionType",
"node": "schema:CommentAction"
}
]
}
}
]
}
This was considered in #76 and rejected as being out of scope. It certainly can be reconsidered in the future, as it is an often featured request. The solution for adding information to graphs is to use framing. See, example 23 which speaks to this specific use case.
(See below)