search

w3c / json-ld-syntax

JSON-LD 1.1 Specification
https://w3c.github.io/json-ld-syntax/
Other
111 stars 22 forks source link

Update included block example based on ones either side #348

Closed azaroth42 closed 4 years ago

azaroth42 commented 4 years ago

Closes #255 ... finally!

:boom: Error: 500 Internal Server Error :boom:

PR Preview failed to build. (Last tried on Apr 14, 2020, 6:07 PM UTC).

More PR Preview relies on a number of web services to run. There seems to be an issue with the following one: :rotating_light: [Spec Generator](https://www.w3.org/2015/labs/) - Spec Generator is the web service used to build specs that rely on ReSpec. :link: [Related URL](https://labs.w3.org/spec-generator/?type=respec&url=https%3A%2F%2Frawcdn.githack.com%2Fw3c%2Fjson-ld-syntax%2F10a2770a5b4e8a217dea309daea69a634ba43505%2Findex.html%3FisPreview%3Dtrue) ``` Navigation timeout of 30000 ms exceeded ``` _If you don't have enough information above to solve the error by yourself (or to understand to which web service the error is related to, if any), please [file an issue](https://github.com/tobie/pr-preview/issues/new?title=Error%20not%20surfaced%20properly&body=See%20w3c/json-ld-syntax%23348.)._
azaroth42 commented 4 years ago

I wanted to demonstrate with the two different properties that it's not just a single relationship, it's a grab bag of any entities that you want to reference. If we don't think that's an issue, then yes, we can remove team.

iherman commented 4 years ago

@azaroth42 see https://github.com/w3c/json-ld-syntax/pull/348#discussion_r407519083

gkellogg commented 4 years ago

I wanted to demonstrate with the two different properties that it's not just a single relationship, it's a grab bag of any entities that you want to reference. If we don't think that's an issue, then yes, we can remove team.

I don't see how this relates to included blocks; that's certainly what has been highlighted.

azaroth42 commented 4 years ago

@BigBlueHat @pchampin ?