Closed jbingham closed 4 years ago
@jbingham, thanks for bumping the priority of this exercise.
The WebNN API editors @wchao1115 @huningxin would appreciate more specific questions (similarly to #2) the explainer doc should provide answers to. That way the doc can cater to its audience the best.
@jbingham, could you take the lead on soliciting the questions?
I’ll drop some references below.
WIP explainer:
https://github.com/webmachinelearning/webnn/blob/master/explainer.md
Related tracking issues:
https://github.com/webmachinelearning/webnn/issues/18 https://github.com/webmachinelearning/webnn/issues/89 https://github.com/webmachinelearning/webnn/issues/74
The explainer has been discussed on CG calls, most recently 01 Oct 2020 with actions taken to improve the explainer:
The next opportunity for discussing the proposed Working Group is the WebML CG Virtual Meeting at TPAC 2020 – 22 October 2020 - 14:00-15:00 UTC+0:
https://github.com/webmachinelearning/meetings/tree/master/2020-10-22-tpac2020
@jbingham, the explainer has been fleshed out based on your feedback: https://github.com/webmachinelearning/webnn/blob/master/explainer.md
Please take a look and document any open questions here so the document can be further improved. Your feedback is much appreciated!
Thanks for the updates, @anssiko . This is much improved. Let's close out this issue, and we can discuss any questions in new issues.
Thanks @jbingham for filing the specific issues. Please join us to discuss your feedback this Thu:
https://github.com/webmachinelearning/meetings/blob/master/telcons/2020-11-12-agenda.md
We at Google are concerned there is insufficient detail in this incubation to proceed to a standard. Could the CG have a conversation about the potential for creating a Working Group prior to drafting this charter? For example, it would be great to see a detailed Explainer fleshed out first.
Let’s clarify what the rationale is for this approach, as opposed to others, and why some feel it’s ready to move to the standard track.