Open sonntag-philipp opened 3 years ago
does that require an API change or should the user agent ensure pending closes are done before attempting to open a device?
Yes, I think it would require an api change as the method signature of MediaStreamTrack.stop()
would change to return a promise.
Anyway, this wouldn't affect existing uses of the method. They could just ignore the return value.
I agree that returning a promise would be useful and allow more flexibility for implementation.
Changing the API does not seem like a good option, given that this is a rather old and stable spec by now. Moving it to mediacapture-extensions in order to figure out how to solve the problem.
Hello there,
I'm currently working with the mediacapture api in different browsers. While working on the MediaStreamTracks, I've noticed that the stop method doesn't provide a way to get notified when the track is actually stopped by the underlying user agent.
This can cause issues in platforms, where a camera can only be opened once by the browser api.
My proposal for a solution would be to make the .stop() method async by returning a promise. The promise should be resolved when the user agent made sure, that the media track is stopped.
The described method in the RFC.